1. Some members were not receiving emails sent from XJbikes.com. For example: "Forgot your password?" function to reset your password would not send email to some members. I believe this has been resolved now. Please use "Contact Us" form (see page footer link) if you still have email issues. SnoSheriff

    Hello Guest. You have limited privileges and you can't "SEARCH" the forums. Please "Log In" or "Sign Up" for additional functionality. Click HERE to proceed.

Valve shim clearance

Discussion in 'XJ Technical Chat' started by machelis, Sep 26, 2012.

  1. machelis

    machelis New Member

    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    An island in Eastern Canada
    Two of my exhaust valve shims accept my .152 gauge. Should I go one lower which I assume it will raise the clearance to .202? I've been told exhaust valves are better a little loose rather than a little tight. Any thoughts?

    Thanks.
     
  2. bigfitz52

    bigfitz52 Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Messages:
    21,283
    Likes Received:
    418
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Rural SE Michigan 60 miles N of Motown
    "Accept" as in JAM it through?

    IN spec is in spec; OUT is out. The whole system is designed so that one shim and one shim only will put a particular valve IN SPEC.

    You're using Imperial ("American") gauges with metric equivalents. If you want to do it easily/right, use a "primarily" metric feeler, like the K-D 2274, widely available.

    For exhaust, .20mm is in spec and .15mm is not. Drop that .002mm. What does .002 MILLIMETERS come out to, anyway?

    Assume nothing, but re-shim. And get a metric gauge. You'll sleep better.
     
  3. machelis

    machelis New Member

    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    An island in Eastern Canada
    'Accept' means it goes through smoothly, but only because there's oil all over the cam lobe and shim. And my feeler gauge is both metric and standard.

    Thanks for the advice.
     
  4. bigfitz52

    bigfitz52 Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Messages:
    21,283
    Likes Received:
    418
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Rural SE Michigan 60 miles N of Motown
    No, your feeler gauge is "standard" (Imperial) printed with metric equivalents.

    I was recommending a purely metric gauge; that is, one whose blades are straight METRIC sizes.

    In other words, instead of your .006" blade which is also marked ".152mm" you would be using a metric blade simply marked ".15mm." Which actually measures .15mm, not .006" (or .1524mm.)

    Makes the job much easier, honest. Especially when you do it for the umpteenth time. (Every 5K miles.)

    You're welcome.
     
  5. machelis

    machelis New Member

    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    An island in Eastern Canada
    So should I re-check with a solely metric gauge before continuing? Or is it obvious that they need changing either way?
     
  6. darkfibre

    darkfibre Member

    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Perth, Australia
    go with the .202 clearance.
     
  7. bigfitz52

    bigfitz52 Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Messages:
    21,283
    Likes Received:
    418
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Rural SE Michigan 60 miles N of Motown
    Oh, definitely. Drop the .002mm, you're in spec at .20mm.
     
  8. machelis

    machelis New Member

    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    An island in Eastern Canada
    Awesome. Thanks fellas.
     

Share This Page